🔗 Share this article

The Australian decisive policy to restrict social networking access for individuals under sixteen is sparking debate internationally. Politicians, campaigners, and guardians are watching closely to see if this approach will become a template for countries abroad.

The European Momentum

Across Europe, a increasing chorus of countries are moving toward similar bans.

• Denmark has stated a prohibition on social media for youth below 15, with the PM declaring that mobile devices and apps are "robbing our children's innocence". The policy is expected to be enacted soon.
• Norway is planning to enforce a access barrier of 15, citing the need to protect young people from the "influence of the algorithms".
• Ireland is working on a digital ID system to verify the identity and age of social media account holders. The media minister have indicated that an Australian-model ban could be "a potential measures under consideration".
• In Spain, the prime minister has asked parliament to enact a proposal lifting the access age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has threatened a ban for those under fifteen, and a legislative committee has recommended a comparable move, including an overnight "digital curfew" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The government in the Netherlands has recommended parents to restrict their kids from social media before 15.

For the broader EU, the bloc's legislature has passed a non-binding motion calling for a ban for under-16s without parental consent is given. Even though it warns of the "habit-forming" design of these services, the move does not enact mandatory rules.

"A clear age restriction is a good first step," commented a leading parliamentarian driving the measure.

The United Kingdom: A Watchful Stance

Across Britain, the government has remained open to a potential ban, arguing that "no measure is off the table" but stressing any decision must be "grounded in strong evidence".

Earlier, momentum built behind a legislative effort to introduce controls on social media use by under-16s, but it was eventually modified. However, the administration committed to investigate the matter.

Charities have expressed warnings. One foundation founded by the family of a teenager who died after being exposed to dangerous social media material contends that a simple age ban might not improve online safety and could create a "cliff edge" of risk when users turn 16.

"This ban is a reaction to the inability of the social media companies to design tools that are appropriate and age appropriate for children," stated a influential online safety campaigner.

The US: A Fragmented Picture

Stateside, action is mostly occurring at the regional level against a backdrop of national stalemate.

• Utah demands guardian permission for those under 18 to use social media and restricts late-night use.
• Florida has signed a measure banning those below 14 from joining social media, though it faces court battles.
• Virginia has passed a law limiting minors to one hour of social media access per day, with additional time requiring parental permission.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have similarly enacted measures mandating parental consent for teenagers to open social media accounts.

Despite bipartisan support and proposals from certain figures to copy Australia's path, a federal ban is right now seen as improbable.

Worldwide Views

Outside of Europe and the US, other countries are similarly considering moves.

• Malaysia intends to prohibit social media for teenagers beginning next year.
• Brazil has lifted the required age for Instagram to 16.

However, international organizations adopt a more measured stance. A major UN agency has warned that blanket prohibitions carry risks and "might prove counterproductive". The body notes that social networks can be a "critical link" for marginalized children and that bans should not be a "replacement" for social media firms to invest in user protection.

While this global conversation continues, the policies of this nation and several other countries demonstrate that governments around the world are less and less willing to stand by for tech companies to make changes on their own.